vendredi 13 octobre 2006

Who's going to tell Captain Codpiece about this?

Only two days ago, George W. Bush was petulantly, whinily, insisting in the Rose Garden that we would stay in Iraq until "the job is done":

The reason I bring this up, these examples up, is that there's a political process that's going forward, and it's the combination of security and a political process that will enable the United States to achieve our objective, which is an Iraq that can govern itself, sustain itself, defend itself, and be an ally in this war on terror.

[snip]

And so Iraq is an important part of dealing with this problem. And my vow to the American people is I understand the stakes, and I understand what it would mean for us to leave before the job is done. And I look forward to listening how -- what Jimmy Baker and Lee Hamilton say about how to get the job -- I appreciate them working on this issue because I think they understand what I know, and the stakes are high.


Somehow I don't think he's going to be very happy with what "Jimmy Baker" and Lee Hamilton have concluded:

A commission formed to assess the Iraq war and recommend a new course has ruled out the prospect of victory for America, according to draft policy options shared with The New York Sun by commission officials.

Currently, the 10-member commission — headed by a secretary of state for President George H.W. Bush, James Baker — is considering two option papers, "Stability First" and "Redeploy and Contain," both of which rule out any prospect of making Iraq a stable democracy in the near term.

More telling, however, is the ruling out of two options last month. One advocated minor fixes to the current war plan but kept intact the long-term vision of democracy in Iraq with regular elections. The second proposed that coalition forces focus their attacks only on Al Qaeda and not the wider insurgency.

Instead, the commission is headed toward presenting President Bush with two clear policy choices that contradict his rhetoric of establishing democracy in Iraq. The more palatable of the two choices for the White House, "Stability First," argues that the military should focus on stabilizing Baghdad while the American Embassy should work toward political accommodation with insurgents. The goal of nurturing a democracy in Iraq is dropped.

The option papers, which sources inside the commission have stressed are still being amended and revised as the panel wraps up its work, give a clearer picture of what Mr. Baker meant in recent interviews when he called for a course adjustment.

They also shed light on what is at stake in the coming 2 1/2 months for the Iraqi government. The "Redeploy and Contain" option calls for the phased withdrawal of American soldiers from Iraq, though the working groups have yet to say when and where those troops will go. The document, read over the telephone to the Sun, says America should "make clear to allies and others that U.S. redeployment does not reduce determination to attack terrorists wherever they are." It also says America's top priority should be minimizing American casualties in Iraq.


These Iraq Study Group conclusion reports represent yet another repetition of the pattern of George W. Bush's life -- screw up royally, and then let Daddy's friends to bail him out. It's clear that the Iraq Study Group was formed by Bush the Father's fine hand to try to extricate Sonny-Boy from his massive Iraq fuckup. The problem is that this report is going to further trigger Dim Son's already-explosive issues with his father -- and you and I and the rest of the world are going to have to bear the costs and the results of whatever lashing out and self-destructive declarations of independence this failed scion of a corrupt family decides to make.

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire