Affichage des articles dont le libellé est tantrums. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est tantrums. Afficher tous les articles

mardi 28 avril 2009

Because after all, what's the need for someone to coordinate health policy in a possible flu pandemic compared to scoring cheap political points?

Yesterday I was walking around saying to anyone who was talking about the swine flu, "It's Captain Trips, man!" -- a reference to Stephen King's mammoth tome The Stand, about the battle between good and evil that results after a "superflu" project hatched in a government facility goes awry and kills off most of the world's population. It's still possible to joke now, and I was actually surprised last night to see that the coverage of the problem on network news programs was surprisingly responsible and not at all hysterical -- a small miracle given the breathless coverage given every time a pretty, young white woman goes missing. I suppose this eschewing the temptation to hype the story for ratings means the swine flu is going to be a very serious problem, perhaps on a 1918 level, before it's all over, and it's certainly a cause for some concern at this point.

But among Washington Republicans, the flu isn't a huge public health threat. Perhaps they believe it's one of the tribulations that's inevitable before Jesus comes back. Or maybe it's that the potential for a pandemic pales before the need to score cheap political points with the Palin/Wurtzelbacher crowd by continuing their already-lost culture war against abortion in their filibuster of Kathleen Sibelius' nomination to head HHS.

Greg Sargent:

So Kathleen Sebelius will get her confirmation vote as Health and Human Services secretary tomorrow in the Senate — but even with the flu outbreak, her confirmation will still have to clear a big hurdle, requiring 60 votes.


So says the office of GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell, anyway.


As you know, Senate Republicans have been filibustering Sebelius over lingering questions about her views on late-term abortions and some campaign contributions she received from an abortion doctor. Late last week, the Senate Dem leadership announced that in the face of GOP opposition, they had agreed with Republicans to bring Sebelius’ confirmation to the floor for a vote tomorrow that would indeed require the 60 votes.


An update to the post indicates a tip from a Senate Republican aide who predicts passage when the vote comes up today, but don't underestimate the Republicans' willingness to do their lunatic base's bidding, even at the cost of just plain common sense.

mardi 27 mai 2008

Monday Big Blue Smurf Blogging -- What They Said

Today's honoree: Arianna Huffington (of all people) for pointing out how silly, self-defeating, and just plain dumbass it would be for progressive women angry that Hillary Clinton isn't nominated to show their anger for voting for John McCain.

Money quote:

The only way John McCain can win is if his reactionary views on choice and women's health issues remain obscured by his faux maverick reputation and the blinding disappointment of Clinton die-hards.


Exactly. And why would women believe John McCain is pro-choice? Because Chris Matthews told them that John McCain is a maverick? There's about as much excuse for not knowing that John McCain is as much a reactionary neanderthal wingnut as the guy he's hoping to replace as there is to, well, not know that there are no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction, nor is there an active nuclear program, in Iraq.

So if you're a Hillary supporter, or you know any, who are thinking that voting for John McCain is somehow going to be a way to get revenge on those mean old Obama supporters, well, you and they are going to have to live with yourselves. Or you could click on over and read about McCain's real record and decide if cutting off your nose to spite your face is such a good idea.