Affichage des articles dont le libellé est blog against theocracy. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est blog against theocracy. Afficher tous les articles

vendredi 12 août 2011

More than just cowboy boots and good hair

I know that the homoerotic nature of male pundits is going to force them th fall madly in love with Rick Perry. After all, he's another grinning, glad-handing sack of shit govenor for Texas with a penchant for macho drag, a sibilant "s" in his speech, an ostentaiously religious man, with a history of lousy grades in college. Hey, what could go wrong?



Here's what could go wrong. We on the left talk a lot about "Christian Taliban", and we've taken a lot of crap because no one's yet in the streets beating up women for voting or wearing short skirts. But that could change under a Rick Perry or Michele Bachmann presidency, because both are part of Christian Reconstruction, as Rachel Maddow pointed out the other night:







I know guys like Joe Scarborough and Chris Matthews love their mancrushes. I just hope that they look at the bigger picture when slobbering all over this guy, at the very least, read this article before deciding that cowboy boots and a full head or hair are sufficient qualifications for presiding over a diverse nation.

samedi 11 avril 2009

Yes, we still need to be concerned about the theocrats


Sorry, but I simply had to choose this logo after watching the spellbinding documentary about YouTube sensation Christian the Lion on Animal Planet this week. (And yes, the most famous now-long-deceased lion in the world WAS so named as an ironic joke.)

But since this is both Blog Against Theocracy weekend, and also the culmination of an extremely bad week for the theocrats and their associated branches of wingnuttia, it's tempting to think that those who would turn this country into Jesusland have been defeated once and for all. They haven't.

There are millions of Christians in this country who attend church, believe Jesus is the literal son of God and was crucified and resurrected, and leave the rest of us alone. They recognize that religion is religion and government is government, and never the twain shall meet. This is how it should be. But let us not be lulled into thinking that the theocrats have run away with their tails tucked between their legs. And while it may seem discriminatory to focus on Christian theocrats, the fact of the matter is that there is no great Jewish movement to make gefilte fish the official food of America, and despite what Glenn Beck and the rest of the frothing gasbags of right wing hate radio might say, this country is NOT headed by some kind of secret Muslim Manchurian President appointed by the Jew George Soros (sic) to turn us into a Muslim caliphate. Nor is there any great Shinto or Hindu or Buddhist or Wiccan push in this country.

In fact, it is Barack Obama's very Christianity that makes him hardly the bulwark against theocracy that we might have wanted to see. Sarah Posner wrote this week about the skewing towards culture warriors on President Obama's Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Some of this is due to Obama's well-learned tendency to try to gracefully straddle two different worlds, but it's clear that Obama's outreach to culture is about more than playing nice, it's also colored by the worldview of his religious background.

I've never understood just why it is that Christianity requires such a high degree of groupthink. Despite what the creationists want us to believe, faith is just that -- faith. It's not based on reason, it's based on faith -- belief that something is true, not KNOWLEDGE that it is true. And that's perfectly all right, if that belief speaks to you in a meaningful way. But why, if the faith is so unshakeable, does Christianity require proseletyzing and conversion, often by force (or more likely today, by having lots of evangelical babies with which to stuff future ballot boxes, and the elimination of beliefs and practices that conflict with that faith? But that is the fundamental paradox of evangelical Christianity -- this notion that one's own religious freedom includes the right to force one's own religious beliefs and practices on the rest of the population, and that is why we will continue to fight it.

As little faith (heh) as I have in Barack Obama's ability or willingness to keep the religious barbarians at the gate at bay, I have even less faith in the people in the GOP who are lined up to try to kick him out of office in 2012. Bobby Jindal is a Catholic theocrat who claims to have performed an exorcism that sounds to the nonbeliever an awful lot like an attempted rape. Mitt Romney hasn't made any outright noises about Mormonism, but let's not forget that he belongs to a church that largely financed Proposition 8 in California, and that is so ruthless about forced conversion that it converts dead Holocaust victims. Newt Gingrich, perhaps unconvinced that simple faith in the divinity of Jesus and his resurrection is enough to buy him absolution for his checkered marital history at the ballot box, is converting to Roman Catholicism. Sarah Palin is perhaps the scariest theocrat of all, an adherent of a particularly aggressive Third Wave form of evangelism that is so utterly at odds with the founding principles of this country that no sane country would ever allow one of its advocated to high office.

It would be easy to comfort ourselves with this year's White House seder, or the decreasing focus of younger evangelicals on culture warrior issues like gay marriage and abortion. But the reality is that the GOP is assembling its army of Christian Soldiers to run to defeat Obama in 2012. 11-year-old kids are committing suicide because of homophobic bullying. Colorado culture warriors are fighting a bill explicitly designed to avoid the "abortifacient" argument about certain types of contraception after the defeat of Amendment 48 last year, which would have given full rights to fertilized eggs.

Newsweek proclaims The End of Christian America only six months after proclaiming the religious right reborn under Sarah Palin, and James Dobson concedes that gains by the movement are limited at best. But when you have a movement that is guided by simple belief alone, and one which requires constant affirmation by others that its beliefs are true, the wall of separation between not just one particular church and state, but between all churches and state; to render unto God that which is God's and render unto Caesar that which is Caesars, remains in peril.