Hillary Rodham Clinton: The candidate the Democratic Hackocracy wants to nominate so it can lose

What other conclusion can one come to when you read something like this, except that the Washington infernal circle of Democratic consultants and entrenched insiders wants to nominate Hillary Clinton specifically so that the party can once again lose the White House?

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday raised the prospect of a terror attack before next year's election, warning that it could boost the GOP's efforts to hold on to the White House.

Discussing the possibility of a new nightmare assault while campaigning in New Hampshire, Clinton also insisted she is the Democratic candidate best equipped to deal with it.

"It's a horrible prospect to ask yourself, 'What if? What if?' But if certain things happen between now and the election, particularly with respect to terrorism, that will automatically give the Republicans an advantage again, no matter how badly they have mishandled it, no matter how much more dangerous they have made the world," Clinton told supporters in Concord.

When you have a candidate like John Edwards, who consistently polls most strongly against ALL of the Republican contenders, you have to wonder why the Democratic Party seems bound and determined to nominate a candidate for whom half of America refuses to vote right out of the gate. Here we have the so-called Democratic frontrunner ready to throw in the towel already if there is another terrorist attack before the election (and given the current Administration's history of ignoring warnings and allowing one to play out, it's a reasonable assumption that there will be one).

At least John Kerry waited till he was the nominee to run a weak-assed campaign.