Judy Miller may go to jail, but the NYT whore machine cranks on

Under what rocks does the New York Times find these guys?

Petty Officer Garcia said he thought the day when Iraqi soldiers could defend their country without help was not too far off.

"When I was there, they were very, very green," he said. "But they're smart, they learn very quickly, and from what I saw, they are eager to stand on their own."

Does he believe critics of the war who say Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon?

CRITICS OF THE WAR??? Excuse me, Kirk Johnson, but it is an established FACT that Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

What kind of moron is still saying that the lack of linkage is something cooked up by the A.N.S.W.E.R. left? Even C-Plus Caligula has admitted that there is no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11.

Is this the kind of "coverage of conservatives" that the Times has announced? If so, then the paper has definitely departed the reality-based community -- and lost a bunch of credibility in the process, despite the fact that their sleepy editorial page has finally awakened:

We did not expect Mr. Bush would apologize for the misinformation that helped lead us into this war, or for the catastrophic mistakes his team made in running the military operation. But we had hoped he would resist the temptation to raise the bloody flag of 9/11 over and over again to justify a war in a country that had nothing whatsoever to do with the terrorist attacks. We had hoped that he would seize the moment to tell the nation how he will define victory, and to give Americans a specific sense of how he intends to reach that goal - beyond repeating the same wishful scenario that he has been describing since the invasion.

Sadly, Mr. Bush wasted his opportunity last night, giving a speech that only answered questions no one was asking. He told the nation, again and again, that a stable and democratic Iraq would be worth American sacrifices, while the nation was wondering whether American sacrifices could actually produce a stable and democratic Iraq.

Given the way this war was planned and executed, the president does not have any good options available, and if American forces were withdrawn, Iraq would probably sink into a civil war that would create large stretches of no man's land where private militias and stateless terrorists could operate with impunity. But if Mr. Bush is intent on staying the course, it will take years before the Iraqi government and its military are able to stand on their own. Most important of all - despite his lofty assurance last night that in the end the insurgents "cannot stop the advance of freedom" - all those years of effort and suffering could still end with the Iraqis turning on each other, or deciding that the American troops were the ultimate enemy after all. The critical challenge is to gauge, with a clear head, exactly when and if the tipping point arrives and the American presence is only making a terrible situation worse.

Note to whoever wrote this editorial: Please remind Mr. Kirk Johnson of the fact that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Thank you for your cooperation.