vendredi 29 février 2008

And if he'd been killed, Drudge would have his blood on his hands

Someone please tell me why it was so important that we know Prince Harry was serving in Afghanistan:

An American website, the Drudge Report, broke a news blackout yesterday by revealing that Prince Harry has been serving in Afghanistan for more than two months.

To the fury of the Ministry of Defence and condemnation from the head of the British Army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, the website announced a "world exclusive" and proclaimed: "They're calling him 'Harry the Hero!".

The article brought to an end an agreement with the media that the Prince's deployment to Helmand be kept quiet in the interests of his safety and that of the soldiers with him.

The decision to send Prince Harry, 23, to Afghanistan under a cloak of secrecy came after the furore that followed the revelation of his proposed deployment to Iraq. Much to the Prince's frustration, General Dannatt announced in May last year that it would be too risky, fearing the Prince and his comrades in the Household Cavalry would become top priority targets for insurgents.

Immediately, officers decided the only way the third-in-line to the throne could continue to do his duty without creating an additional security risk was to send him secretly, calling on the media to co-operate in a news blackout.

By July, editors of key newspapers and broadcasting organisations were sounded out to see if such assistance would be forthcoming. Without dissent, all agreed that it was the only sensible and safe solution.

In December, days before Cornet Wales – as the Prince is known in The Blues and Royals – deployed to Helmand, editors met MoD officials and signed an understanding setting out the terms of the news blackout. While not a legally binding document, it was a statement of faith from the British press.

It is thought the source for the Drudge Report article was a story printed last month in an Australian women's magazine, New Idea. The Drudge Report is most famous for breaking the Monica Lewinsky scandal after Newsweek decided not to publish the story.

At 3.30pm yesterday the MoD received a call, confirming fears that a foreign news organisation would break the silence. A decision was taken to make a formal statement confirming the Prince had been in Afghanistan.

"I am very disappointed that foreign websites have decided to run this story without consulting us. This is in stark contrast to the highly responsible attitude that the whole of the UK print and broadcast media, along with a small number of overseas outlets, who have entered into an understanding with us over the coverage of Prince Harry on operations," General Dannatt said.


A scoop is one thing...but by publicizing this, Drudge put every man Harry is serving with in danger.

Say what you will about the royals, Harry's commitment to his military service is laudable. But when said royal is serving with other men, it puts ALL their lives in danger to reveal that he's on active duty.

Does Drudge's need to scoop trump soldiers' lives? Now, thanks to Matt Drudge's need for attention, the British army has to get him out of there. Drudge may not have been the first to get the story, but he described it as an exclusive, and since Drudge gets more traffic than the smaller outlets who blew the cover earlier, he bears a great deal of the responsiblity.

And shame on the rest of the U.S. press for pulling this story from Drudge and running with it.

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire