John makes a very good point here:
I think this article in today's Washington Post makes clear that the issue of George Bush's missing-in-action status during the Vietnam War is now relevant once again.
We are a nation at war and it is unnacceptable that there be any doubt in our troops' minds as to whether their commander in chief is a traitor and a coward. Again, the Washington Post article makes clear that the issue as to whether George Bush, standing before the American people as a holier-than-thou spokesman for the war in Iraq, is truly fit to be such a spokesman, let alone the commander in chief of our brave men and women in uniform.
Our troops deserve nothing less than the truth. Is our commander in chief a coward?
If Jack Murtha's credibility about HIS service is up for grabs because he wants to bring the troops home, then isn't George W. Bush's credibility about HIS service fair game because he wants endless war?
I say we start digging into Bush's Texas Air National Guard records again.
Sauce for the goose, baby.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire